RADIO: TRUMP WILL NOT PURSUE CLINTON CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, Part 1
Earlier this week, author J.B. Williams was a special guest on Your Defending Fathers radio with Brian Summerfield and “Trucker” Randy Bishop. J.B. discussed BREAKING NEWS announced on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, earlier that morning. Co-host, Mika Brzenski said Trump would not pursue further criminal investigations against the Clintons—and MSM went wild. Mediate picked it up with its REPORT: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough.‘
The following podcast is Part 1/2 with J.B. Williams, of The North American Law Center and co-author of TRUMPED: A New American Revolution, transcribed below.
PODCAST No. 1 of 2:
YDF (Your Defending Founders co-hosts Brian and Randy): J.B. Williams is here with the North American Law Center. JB, please, can you please explain to our simple trucker’s mind, what the hell Kellyanne Conway said this morning with Joe Scarborough and the little Communist girl, Mika Brzenski? What the heck is going on? Is he backpedaling on what he said in the debate, what he said in all the rallies, and he said he was going to appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillary Clinton and put her in jail. What the heck is going on?
JB (J.B. Williams): You know, I’m amazed at this whole turn of events, to be honest with ya. Not DISMAYED, just AMAZED. First off, I want to point out that there is a difference between running for office and holding office. There’s a big difference between those two things–not that somebody walked away from some promises they made while running for office, once they get in office–we all hate that. But as far as I know, Donald Trump was not running for a prosecutor’s office, he was running for the President of the United States–and what most of us who voted for him are sick and tired of, is a President or Vice-President–like the Clintons, using FBI, or the DOJ, or the IRS or another federal agencies as hit squads for political foes. So what we wanted when we voted for Donald Trump was not someone who was going to go in and do the same thing they were doing and using those agencies as political hit squads for political foes, but someone who would take the politics out of those agencies and allow them to do the jobs they are supposed to be doing. In other words, it’s not Trump’s job to be prosecuting Hillary Clinton–it never was, it is the job of the Dept. of Justice to bring charges and I suspect if the evidence supports those charges, they will bring charges. It never was Donald Trump’s job to play prosecutor from the Oval Office.
YDF: So what you’re saying, just to be clear, is in the debate when the issue came up about it looking like a political retaliation against Hillary, when he said those words, the commenters made statements to that effect, basically what you’re saying is ” You get elected President and we vote for you, you’re going to use the fearsome Justice Department to go after your political enemy,” is what he’s trying to backpedal on and make it kinda look like they have a separate job description, vs. him being President?
JB: I don’t think it’s a back-pedal, at all, Randy. I think what they’re simply saying is, “I didn’t run for the office of prosecutor. I ran for the office of President. The President is not supposed to play prosecutor and what was happening in previous administrations, is that the FBI wanted to bring about criminal charges against Hillary Clinton, but it was the DOJ and Loretta Lynch who was blocking their ability to assign a special prosecutor to that investigation. I think what the Trump Administration has been saying all along, is we’re no longer going to play politics with these agencies. We are neither going to block at the DOJ the FBI’s ability to deliver their evidence to a grand jury, and get an indictment against someone, we’re no longer going to block that evidence from moving to a natural conclusion, under the U.S. laws, nor are we gonna go play politics in the other direction and go down to the FBI and use those agencies as a hit squad for our foes. We’re not going to do either one of those things, we’re going to expect those agencies to do their jobs.
YDF: Okay, let me interject a question at the point: Does the FBI Director James Comey stay on in the Trump Administration, or do you think Donald Trump asks him for his resignation?
JB: Uh, he has to go. But I’m not talking to Donald Trump, so I don’t know what he intends to do, in that regard, but I don’t think James Comey can afford to stay on. In the same way, I can’t see how Loretta Lynch is going to continue as head of the DOJ.
YDF: Well, let me ask you this: If he does, then, ask for Comey’s resignation and appoints another FBI director and if this person is anti-Clinton Foundation, anti-Clinton Email Server, isn’t that going to be spun that he appointed somebody to head up and take over the FBI and make it a political hit squad again?
JB: Of course, that’s how the media will spin it. But look, the media is asking an incorrect question right now. They know they’re asking an incoming President whether or not he’s going to play prosecutor. And of course, if you ask the wrong question, you’re going to get the wrong answer. But you’re going to get the answer you wanted, to put out in the press and wanted to create a divide and undermine the supporters of Trump by saying, “Look! He’s already back-pedaling. He’s not going to prosecute.” Well, he was never going to personally prosecute Hillary Clinton, that’s not the job of the President. But he is, hopefully, going to make sure that politics is taken out of those agencies so that the agencies, so the agencies are allowed to do the jobs they’re there to do. That’s follow the evidence wherever it goes and it shouldn’t matter who the subject of the investigation is. What should matter is whether or not the evidence supports bringing charges, or doesn’t support bringing charges.
So, this is on a Tuesday, two days before Thanksgiving–why did they do it today?
JB: I suspect it’s because the media asked an inappropriate question and they answered the question. And now they have to answer to the question. See what I mean? This is the game the media plays, non-stop. It goes back to the old question, “When did you stop beating your wife. . .” It’s like all the allegations coming out now, that Donald Trump is an international business man, with international interests. But now that he’s elected, they’re concerned that that could cause a Constitutional crisis, in the form of pay-to-play through his business interests–WHILE we have ignored, for years, the pay-to-play operations with the Clinton side and the Obama side. So, it’s just the media doing what the media does. Unfortunately, the media isn’t the news media anymore–it’s a PROPAGANDA MACHINE that looks to shape public opinion and that’s what they’re doing.
YDF: J.B. Williams, with the North American Law Center. J.B., the Law Center put together in research form, detailed charges against Barack Obama, as to where he was guilty of treason in office and should be impeached. Has the Law Center done anything in regard to charges against Hillary Clinton? I know there was something done regarding Benghazi, overall, but anything specific to Hillary Clinton, anything specific regarding the emails, or anything specific to the Clinton Foundation?
JB: We have put out only memos on the subjects of those items, pointing out what laws had been violated by those actions. Some of them rising to the level of TREASON, to be honest. And we’ve put out some review documents to members of Congress, on those issues, pointing out to them what laws had been broken in the process. I fully anticipate this administration is going to expect that every agency does what it’s supposed to do. I think they’re going to do the best they can to step out of the way, politically, and let those agencies will do what they’re going to do. I think there is plenty of evidence to bring charges against Hillary Clinton, and under the new Department of Justice, it will result in some form of charges, I suspect.
YDF: I have to interject, Brian–one comment came in just now, “Doesn’t somebody actually have to file a complaint with the Department of Justice alleging whatever they’re going to allege?” So basically, J.B., to answer your question–in the answering of this question, “Yes,” but Brian just asked about an agency or organization coming out with another 500 or so emails–whatever it was, talking about pay-to-play. So there will be outside sources going to this Justice Dept. to bring charges forward. Is that a correct assumption of the process that needs to be done?
JB: It’s unfortunate. I’d say “Yes,” in a word. But it’s unfortunate that throughout the Obama Administration, these agencies have not been allowed to do their job. The FBI has been stepped on, the DOJ has been stepped on, ICE has been stepped on, the IRS has been used as a hit squad, so we’re coming we’re coming out of an administration that has a history of using and and abusing and misusing these agencies for the last 8 years. So people, including the media has been accustomed to that practice. It’s almost shocking, the notion that a President might come in and take the politics out of those agencies, entirely, and let them do that which they’re supposed to d0—that’s follow the evidence wherever it leads.
As a result of that, over the last 8 years, as you both know…we have been forced out in the public domain to do a lot of investigative work ourselves because the prior (current) Administration was standing on the heads of the agencies who were normally supposed to do that. In the same way, reporting “fake news.” They talk about “fake news.” Well, nobody has been more engaged in “fake news” than all the major, mainstream media outlets. That’s who does the fake news the most in this country.
As a result, we have been forced in the public domain to become investigators and reporters ourselves, because no one else is reporting the truth and the facts. So, as a result of those circumstances over the last 8 years, a lot of information is now coming into the agencies from the outside, but a lot of the stuff that got leaked in the last few months–enough to win the election, a lot of that was being leaked from inside the agencies, who were frustrated with the fact that DOJ was standing on their neck and not allowing them to go forward with the evidence. So, when they were not able to go forward through normal channels, they just started dumping it out, anonymously, into the public domain to where the people could see it and that made the people the judge and jury on November 8th.
YdF: Those were some good points, talking about there are still some good people inside of some of these bureaucracies, the bureaucratic agencies that did that type of work and used Anonymous and Wikileaks to do that. I’ve got something about that after the break.
Click to hear podcast 2 of this interview, which focuses on next what’s next…
GET TRUMPED: THE NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION
By J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington
TRUMPED: An essential guide to the recent 2016 Presidential election, when a totally frustrated American electorate would result in a shakeup of both major political parties in 2016—a year of political upsets by the outsiders.
TRUMPED is a story about the people behind the movement to retake control of the Republican Party and the country. There is only 1 chapter on Donald Trump, 13 on the New American Revolution.
TRUMPED tells the truth about the counter-revolution to destroy America and the New American Revolution to reclaim the uniquely American birthright to freedom and liberty. TRUMPED is about the American spirit and the people like YOU, who want their country back!
This book makes a GREAT Stocking Stuffer!